Randomized trial of an alternate human papillomavirus vaccine administration schedule in college-aged women.


One hundred eighty-eight women completed the study, with all 12 dropouts in the alternate schedule group (p < 0.001). Antibody responses in the alternate schedule were noninferior to the standard schedule for all vaccine types (p < 0.0001). Among the per-protocol population, GMTs (95% CI) for the alternate schedule were 4,440 (3,080-5,696), 5,688 (3,960-7,291), 12,443 (8,611-15,977), and 2,129 (1,183-3,063) for HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18, respectively, vs. 2,153 (1,794-2,478), 1,966 (1,401-2,491), 6,218 (4,367-7,946), and 1,370 (1,167-1,553) for the standard schedule. Time between doses 2 and 3 significantly predicted final titer for all virus types (p < 0.005).

Two hundred nonpregnant women, aged 18-23 years, with <5 sexual partners were randomized into standard and alternate schedules. Blood samples were drawn before dose 1 and 2-6 weeks after dose 3 and analyzed with the competitive Luminex immunoassay. Seropositives at baseline were eliminated from analyses by HPV type. Log-transformed titers were used to calculate HPV type-specific geometric mean titers (GMTs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each group. Noninferiority was tested against a one-sided null hypothesis that the post-dose 3 GMT ratio of the alternate to standard schedule was < or =0.5 for each HPV type.

For all HPV vaccine types, the GMT ratios indicated noninferiority of the alternate vaccine administration schedule at 0, 2, and 12 months. The alternate schedule may be used to expand options for the timing of the third dose in the HPV vaccine schedule.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is effective against HPV types 16 and 18, which cause 70% of cervical cancers. The three-dose vaccination schedule at 0, 2, and 6 months may be inconvenient for college-aged women. This study assessed noninferiority of the immune response to an alternate vaccination schedule at 0, 2, and 12 months.

MIDAS Network Members