Close
MIDAS Network Member

Paper Information

Title

Too Good to Be True? Evaluation of Colonoscopy Sensitivity Assumptions Used in Policy Models.

Abstract

Models can help guide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening policy. While models are carefully calibrated and validated, there is less scrutiny of assumptions about test performance.

We examined the validity of the CRC-SPIN model and colonoscopy sensitivity assumptions. Standard sensitivity assumptions, consistent with published decision analyses, assume sensitivity equal to 0.75 for diminutive adenomas (<6mm), 0.85 for small adenomas (6-10mm), 0.95 for large adenomas ( {greater than or equal to} 10mm), and 0.95 for preclinical cancer. We also selected adenoma sensitivity that resulted in more accurate predictions. Targets were drawn from the Wheat Bran Fiber study. We examined how well the model predicted outcomes measured over a three-year follow-up period, including: the number of adenomas detected, the size of the largest adenoma detected, and incident CRC.

Misspecification of either colonoscopy sensitivity or disease progression in high-risk populations may impact the predicted effectiveness of CRC screening. When possible, decision analyses used to inform policy should address these uncertainties.

Colonoscopy may be less accurate than currently assumed, especially for diminutive adenomas. Alternatively, the CRC-SPIN model may not accurately simulate onset and progression of adenomas in higher-risk populations.

Using standard sensitivity assumptions, the model predicted adenoma prevalence that was too low (42.5% versus 48.9% observed, with 95% confidence interval 45.3%-50.7%) and detection of too few large adenomas (5.1% versus 14.% observed, with 95% confidence interval 11.8%-17.4%). Predictions were close to targets when we set sensitivities to 0.20 for diminutive adenomas, 0.60 for small adenomas, 0.80 for 10-20mm adenomas, and 0.98 for adenomas 20mm and larger.

Journal

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology

Citation

MIDAS Authors